1. Home
  2. B2B audiences
  3. HR leaders
B2B audience

HR decision maker survey sample

The people who actually choose the HRIS, the benefits carrier and the recruiting stack, verified against their employer before they count.

Feasibility check

Request a project quote

All fields needed. Back the same business day for standard audiences.

Choose a study type, or pick help me choose
Choose the audience you need, or pick other or mixed
Choose a market, or pick several markets
Enter the number of completes you need, as a whole number
Enter your best estimate in whole minutes
Add quotas, session format, exclusions or a deadline
Enter a work email so we can send the numbers back

No signup. One reply with feasibility, timing and pricing, not a sales call.

HR decision maker survey sample is CHROs, HR directors and benefits, talent and HRIS leaders recruited for a quantitative survey. Typical US incidence is 15%. The audience is broad, so most HR sample problems are targeting problems: a benefits study answered by recruiters produces confident wrong answers. Screening on decision area, not department, is what makes the data usable.

Feasibility

What is the feasibility for HR and people leaders in the United States?

Current numbers for a standard seniority screen at the default company size. Tighter screens move every figure, and we quote the exact read for your spec rather than asking you to work from these.

Reachable in the US
1,900
Incidence in broad supply
15%
Recommended interview length
15 min
Field window, 250 completes
7 days

What moves these numbers

Table comparing If you add this to the spec, Incidence moves and Field window
If you add this to the specIncidence movesField window
Restrict to one decision area such as benefits15% to about 9%Add 2 days
Raise the company size floor to 1,000+ employees15% to about 8%Add 3 days
Require a named HRIS in use15% to about 7%Add 3 to 4 days
Widen to any HR role at 100+ employees15% to about 34%Save 2 days
Reviewed quarterly. Reachable n counts our own panel plus the partner supply we would use for this audience, which is why it is larger than the panel on its own. Incidence is the expected screener yield against broad business supply, the basis a quote is built on, for the screener described here; a different screener gives a different rate, and targeting from a profiled panel does better than these figures. Field windows assume a study of 250 completes, a 10 to 15 minute interview and no industry quotas. Reachable n is the size of the qualified pool, not the number of invitations. Cost per complete is quoted per spec and holds through field.Get the CPI for your spec
Why it is hard

Why is HR and people leaders sample hard to get right?

HR is a broad function and the value of the sample depends entirely on which part of it you reach. A benefits study answered by recruiters, or an HRIS study answered by HR generalists at companies with 20 people, produces confident wrong answers. Most HR sample problems are targeting problems. We screen on decision area, not just department, and we ask company size as a number so that "enterprise HR" means what your client thinks it means.

Who qualifies

Who counts as HR and people leaders?

  • CHRO
  • VP of People
  • HR Director
  • Director of Benefits
  • Director of Talent Acquisition
  • HRIS or People Operations lead
  • Head of Learning and Development
  • Head of Total Rewards

What company size and firmographics apply?

Default cut is 100 or more employees. Enterprise cut at 1,000+. Decision area quotas, for example benefits versus talent versus HR technology, are standard because they change who qualifies.

What does the screener actually ask?

"Which of the following areas of HR do you have decision making responsibility for?" with a select all that apply list of benefits, payroll, HRIS and HR technology, recruiting, learning, compensation and compliance. Then a budget authority question specific to the area your study covers.

How do you verify HR and people leaders?

Employment verified through corporate domain or professional record with title match. Category question tied to the decision area, for example which HRIS or benefits administration platform is in use or how open enrollment is run, reviewed for consistency with company size and role.

Read the full data quality process

What kinds of study can this audience support?

Online quant, benefits and HR technology buyer research, employer brand and employee experience vendor studies, tracker waves, and HR leader recruitment for interviews.

Delivered by redirect into any hosted survey platform. We pass a respondent identifier and any quota variables on the way in, and test the links with you before launch.

Study types

What do clients usually run with this audience?

  • Benefits carrier and benefits administration platform selection research
  • HRIS, payroll and people analytics vendor evaluation
  • Employer brand and recruiting channel effectiveness among talent leaders
  • Learning and development buying research, including budget holders only
  • Total rewards and compensation tooling studies at enterprise scale
Illustrative

What does a typical project look like?

A US benefits administration platform fields 250 completes among benefits decision makers at 250+ employees, 15 minute instrument. Screening on benefits authority rather than the HR department is what keeps incidence at 15%; screening on department alone would have doubled it and filled the sample with recruiters. Seven days in field.

An illustrative scenario built from typical figures for this audience, not a named client engagement. It will be replaced with a real case once one is cleared for use.

Questions

HR and people leaders sample: frequently asked questions

How do you stop a benefits study being answered by recruiters?

By screening on decision area rather than department. The screener asks which HR areas the respondent has authority over, and only benefits authority qualifies for a benefits study. Screening on department alone roughly doubles incidence and fills the sample with the wrong people.

Can you reach HR leaders at specific company sizes?

Yes. One hundred employees is the default floor because HR becomes a distinct decision making function around there. Raising it to 1,000+ takes incidence from about 15% to about 8% and adds three days in field.

How do you make sure HR respondents are decision makers for my specific topic?

The screener asks which HR decision areas they own, not just whether they work in HR. A benefits study only qualifies people with benefits authority. Then a category question about the platform or process they run in that area is reviewed by a person before the complete counts.

What company size can you reach for HR leaders?

One hundred or more employees is the default, where HR becomes a distinct decision making function. Enterprise cuts at 1,000+ employees are available at lower incidence. Company size is asked as a number and checked against the named employer where possible.

What is the cost per complete for HR decision makers?

Quoted per spec at feasibility and held through field. Enterprise cuts and narrow decision area screens are what move it, because they lower incidence. The estimator on our tools page shows the effect of each change using typical market figures.

Can you reach HR leaders outside the US?

Yes, with UK, Canada, Germany and Australia as the strongest markets. Feasibility differs by country and is quoted per market rather than as a global figure.

How long is a typical HR study in field?

Seven days for 300 completes at standard incidence. Narrow screens extend that and we say so at feasibility.

Send the spec. Get real numbers back.

Audience, market, target n, expected interview length. Feasibility the same business day for standard audiences, with reachable counts, an estimated qualification rate we believe and a quoted cost per complete that stays fixed for the agreed brief.

Request a project quote
Request a quote